Psychoanalysis: Freudian school 1926-021/1926

Freud, Sigmund (1926-021/1926): Psychoanalysis: Freudian school

Zurück zum Werk
  • S.

    253

     

    PSYCHOANALYSIS: FREUDIAN SCHOOL—In the years 
    1880–2 a Viennese physician, Dr. Josef Breuer (1842–1925), dis-
    covered a new procedure by means of which he relieved a girl,
    who was suffering from severe hysteria, of her various symptoms.
    The idea occurred to him that the symptoms were connected
    with impressions which she had received during a period of ex-
    citement while she was nursing her sick father. He therefore
    induced her, while she was in a state of hypnotic somnambulism,
    to search for these connections in her memory and to live through
    the “pathogenic” scenes once again without inhibiting the
    affects that arose in the process. He found that when she had
    done this the symptom in question disappeared for good. This
    was at a date before the investigations of Charcot and
    Pierre Janet into the origin of hysterical symptoms, and Breuer’s
    discovery was thus entirely uninfluenced by them. But he did

    not pursue the matter any further at the time, and it was not
    until some 10 years later that he took it up again in collaboration
    with Sigmund Freud. In 1895 they published a book, Studien
    über Hysterie, in which Breuer’s discoveries were described and
    an attempt was made to explain them by the theory of Catharsis.
    According to that hypothesis, hysterical symptoms originate
    through the energy of a mental process being withheld from
    conscious influence and being diverted into bodily innervation
    (“Conversion”). A hysterical symptom would thus be a sub-
    stitute for an omitted mental act and a reminiscence of the occa-
    sion which should have given rise to that act. And, on this view,
    recovery would be a result of the liberation of the affect that had
    been arrested and of its discharge along a normal path (“Abre-
    action”). Cathartic treatment gave excellent therapeutic re-
    sults, but it was found that they were not permanent and that
    they were dependent on the personal relation between the patient
    and the physician. Freud, who later proceeded with these in-
    vestigations by himself, made an alteration in their technique,
    by replacing hypnosis by the method of free association. He
    invented the term “psychoanalysis,” which in the course of
    time came to have two meanings: (1) a particular method of
    treating nervous disorders and (2) the science of unconscious
    mental processes, which has also been appropriately described
    as “depth-psychology.”

    Subject Matter of Psychoanalysis—Psychoanalysis finds a
    constantly increasing amount of support as a therapeutic pro-
    cedure, owing to the fact that it can do more for certain classes
    of patients than any other method of treatment. The principal
    field of its application is in the milder neuroses—hysteria, pho-
    bias and obsessional states, but in malformations of character
    and in sexual inhibitions or abnormalities it can also bring about
    marked improvements or even recoveries. Its influence upon
    dementia praecox and paranoia is doubtful; on the other hand,
    in favourable circumstances it can cope with depressive states,
    even if they are of a severe type.

    In every instance the treatment makes heavy claims upon both
    the physician and the patient; the former requires a special
    training, and must devote a long period of time to exploring the
    mind of each patient, while the latter must make considerable
    sacrifices, both material and mental. Nevertheless, all the trouble
    involved is as a rule rewarded by the results. Psychoanalysis
    does not act as a convenient panacea (“cilo, tute, jucunde!”)
    upon all psychological disorders. On the contrary, its applica-
    tion has been instrumental in making clear for the first time the
    difficulties and limitations in the treatment of such affections.

    The therapeutic results of psychoanalysis depend upon the
    replacement of unconscious mental acts by conscious ones and
    are operative in so far as that process has significance in relation
    to the disorder under treatment. The replacement is effected
    by overcoming internal resistances in the patient’s mind. The
    future will probably attribute far greater importance to psycho-
    analysis as the science of the unconscious than as a therapeutic
    procedure.

    Depth-psychology—Psychoanalysis, in its character of depth
    psychology, considers mental life from three points of view: the
    dynamic, the economic and the topographical.

    From the first of these standpoints, the dynamic one, psycho-
    analysis derives all mental processes (apart from the reception
    of external stimuli) from the interplay of forces, which assist or
    inhibit one another, combine with one another, enter into com-
    promises with one another, etc. All of these forces are originally
    in the nature of instincts; that is to say, they have an organic
    origin. They are characterised by possessing an immense (so-
    matic) persistence and a reserve of power (“repetition-compul-
    sion”); and they are represented mentally as images or ideas
    with an affective charge (“cathexis”). In psychoanalysis, no
    less than in other sciences, the theory of instincts is an obscure
    subject. An empirical analysis leads to the formation of two
    groups of instincts: the so-called “ego-instincts,” which are
    directed towards self-preservation and the “object-instincts,”
    which are concerned with relations to an external object. The
    social instincts are not regarded as elementary or irreducible.

  • S.

    254

    Theoretical speculation leads to the suspicion that there are
    two fundamental instincts which lie concealed behind the mani-
    fest ego-instincts and object-instincts: namely (a) Eros, the
    instinct which strives for ever closer union, and (b) the instinct
    of destruction, which leads toward the dissolution of what is
    living. In psychoanalysis the manifestation of the force of Eros
    is given the name “libido.” From the economic standpoint
    psychoanalysis supposes that the mental representations of the
    instincts have a cathexis of definite quantities of energy, and that
    it is the purpose of the mental apparatus to hinder any dam-
    ming-up of these energies and to keep as low as possible the total
    amount of the excitations to which it is subject. The course of
    mental processes is automatically regulated by the “pleasure-
    pain principle”; and pain is thus in some way related to an in-
    crease of excitation and pleasure to a decrease. In the course of
    development the original pleasure principle undergoes a modifi-
    cation with reference to the external world, giving place to the
    “reality-principle,” whereby the mental apparatus learns to post-
    pone the pleasure of satisfaction and to tolerate temporarily
    feelings of pain.
     

    Mental Topography.—Topographically, psychoanalysis re-
    gards the mental apparatus as a composite instrument, and
    endeavours to determine at what points in it the various mental
    processes do take place. According to the most recent psycho-
    analytic views, the mental apparatus is composed of an “id,”
    which is the reservoir of the instinctive impulses, of an “ego,”
    which is the most superficial portion of the id and one which is
    modified by the influence of the external world, and of a “super-
    ego,” which develops out of the id, dominates the ego and repre-
    sents the inhibitions of instinct characteristic of man. Further,
    the property of consciousness has a topographical reference; for
    processes in the id are entirely unconscious, while consciousness is
    the function of the ego’s outermost layer, which is concerned
    with the perception of the external world.
     

    At this point two observations may be in place. It must not
    be supposed that these very general ideas are presuppositions
    upon which the work of psychoanalysis depends. On the con-
    trary, they are its latest conclusions and are in every respect open
    to revision. Psychoanalysis is founded securely upon the obser-
    vation of the facts of mental life; and for that very reason its
    (theoretical superstructure is still incomplete and subject to con-
    stant alteration. Secondly, there is no reason for astonishment
    that psychoanalysis, which was originally no more than an
    attempt at explaining pathological mental phenomena, should
    have developed into a psychology of normal mental life. The
    justification for this arose with the discovery that the dreams
    and mistakes (“parapraxes,” such as slips of the tongue, etc.) of
    normal men have the same mechanism as neurotic symptoms.
     

    Theoretical Basis.—The first task of psychoanalysis was the
    elucidation of nervous disorders. The analytical theory of the
    neuroses is based upon three ground-pillars: the recognition of
    (1) “repression,” of (2) the importance of the sexual instincts
    and of (3) “transference.”
     

    Censorship.—There is a force in the mind which exercises the
    functions of a censorship, and which excludes from consciousness
    and from any influence upon action all tendencies which dis-
    please it. Such tendencies are described as “repressed.” They
    remain unconscious; and if the physician attempts to bring them
    into the patient’s consciousness he provokes a “resistance.”
    These repressed instinctual impulses, however, are not always
    made powerless by this process. In many cases they succeed in
    making their influence felt by circuitous paths, and the indirect
    or substitutive gratification of repressed impulses is what con-
    stitutes neurotic symptoms.
     

    Sexual Instincts.—For cultural reasons the most intensive
    repression falls upon the sexual instincts; but it is precisely in
    connection with them that repression most easily miscarries, so
    that neurotic symptoms are found to be substitutive gratifica-
    tions of repressed sexuality. The belief that in man sexual life
    begins only at puberty is incorrect. On the contrary, signs of it
    can be detected from the beginning of extra-uterine existence; it
    reaches a first culminating point at or before the fifth year
    (“early period”), after which it is inhibited or interrupted
    (“latency period”) until the age of puberty, which is the second
    climax of its development. This double onset of sexual develop-
    ment seems to be distinctive of the genus Homo. All experiences
    during the first period of childhood are of the greatest importance
    to the individual, and in combination with his inherited sexual
    constitution, form the dispositions for the subsequent develop-
    ment of character or disease. It is a mistaken belief that sexuality
    coincides with “genitality.” The sexual instincts pass through
    a complicated course of development, and it is only at the end
    of it that the “primacy of the genital zone” is attained. Before
    this there are a number of “pre-genital organisations” of the
    libido—points at which it may become “fixated,” and to which,
    in the event of subsequent repression, it will return (“regres-
    sion”). The infantile fixations of the libido are what determine
    the form of neurosis which sets in later. Thus the neuroses are
    to be regarded as inhibitions in the development of the libido.
     

    The Oedipus Complex.—There are no specific causes of nerv-
    ous disorders; the question whether a conflict finds a healthy
    solution or leads to a neurotic inhibition of function depends
    upon quantitative considerations, that is, upon the relative
    strength of the forces concerned. The most important conflict
    with which a small child is faced is his relation to his parents,
    the “Oedipus complex”; it is in attempting to grapple with this
    problem that persons destined to suffer from a neurosis habitu-
    ally fail. The reactions against the instinctual demands of the
    Oedipus complex are the source of the most precious and socially
    important achievements of the human mind; and this probably
    holds true not only in the life of individuals but also in the history
    of the human species as a whole. The super-ego, the moral factor
    which dominates the ego, also has its origin in the process of
    overcoming the Oedipus complex.
     

    Transference.—By “transference” is meant a striking peculiar-
    ity of neurotics. They develop toward their physician emotional
    relations, both of an affectionate and hostile character, which
    are not based upon the actual situation but are derived from their
    relations toward their parents (the Oedipus complex). Trans-
    ference is a proof of the fact that adults have not overcome their
    former childish dependence; it coincides with the force which
    has been named “suggestion”; and it is only by learning to
    make use of it that the physician is enabled to induce the patient
    to overcome his internal resistances and do away with his repres-
    sions. Thus psychoanalytic treatment acts as a second educa-
    tion of the adult, as a corrective to his education as a child.
     

    Within this narrow compass it has not been possible to men-
    tion many matters of the greatest interest, such as the “subli-
    mation” of instincts, the part played by symbolism, the problem
    of “ambivalence,” etc. Nor has there been space to allude to the
    applications of psychoanalysis, which originated, as we have
    seen, in the sphere of medicine, to other departments of knowl-
    edge (such as Anthropology, the Study of Religion, Literary
    History and Education) where its influence is constantly in-
    creasing. It is enough to say that psychoanalysis, in its char-
    acter of the psychology of the deepest, unconscious mental acts,
    promises to become the link between Psychiatry and all of these
    other fields of study.
     

    The Psychoanalytic Movement.—The beginnings of psycho-
    analysis may be marked by two dates: 1895, which saw the pub-
    lication of Breuer and Freud’s Studien über Hysterie, and 1900,
    which saw that of Freud’s Traumdeutung. At first the new dis-
    coveries aroused no interest either in the medical profession or
    among the general public. In 1907 the Swiss psychiatrists, under
    the leadership of E. Bleuler and C. G. Jung, began to concern
    themselves in the subject; and in 1908 there took place at Salz-
    burg a first meeting of adherents from a number of different coun-
    tries. In 1909 Freud and Jung were invited to America by G.
    Stanley Hall to deliver a series of lectures on psychoanalysis at
    Clark University, Worcester, Mass. From that time forward in-
    terest in Europe grew rapidly; it showed itself, however, in a
    forcible rejection of the new teachings, characterised by an emo-
    tional colouring which sometimes bordered upon the unscientific.

  • S.

    355

    PSYCHOLOGY

    The reasons for this hostility are to be found, from the medical
    point of view, in the fact that psychoanalysis lays stress upon
    psychical factors, and from the philosophical point of view, in its
    assuming as an underlying postulate the concept of unconscious
    mental activity; but the strongest reason was undoubtedly the
    general disinclination of mankind to concede to the factor of sex-
    uality such importance as is assigned to it by psychoanalysis. In
    spite of this widespread opposition, however, the movement in
    favour of psychoanalysis was not to be checked. Its adherents
    formed themselves into an International Association, which
    passed successfully through the ordeal of the World War, and at
    the present time comprises local groups in Vienna, Berlin, Buda-
    pest, London, Switzerland, Holland, Moscow and Calcutta, as
    well as two in the United States. There are three journals repre-
    senting the views of these societies: the Internationale Zeitschrift
    für Psychoanalyse, Imago (which is concerned with the appli-
    cation of psychoanalysis to non-medical fields of knowledge),
    and the International Journal of Psycho-Analysis.

    During the years 1911–3, two former adherents, Alfred Adler,
    of Vienna, and C. G. Jung, of Zürich, seceded from the psycho-
    analytic movement and founded schools of thought of their own.
    In 1921 Dr. M. Eitingon founded in Berlin the first public psycho-
    analytic clinic and training-school, and this was soon followed
    by a second in Vienna. For the moment these are the only in-
    stitutions on the continent of Europe which make psychoanalytic
    treatment accessible to the wage-earning classes.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY.—Breuer and Freud, Studien über Hysterie (1895);
    Freud, Traumdeutung (1900); Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens
    (1904); Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie (1905); Vorlesungen zur
    Einführung in die Psychoanalyse (1916). Freud’s complete works
    have been published in Spanish (Obras completas) (1924), and Ger-
    man (Gesammelte Schriften) (1925); the greater part of them has
    been translated into English and other languages. Short accounts of
    the subject-matter and history of psychoanalysis will be found in:
    Freud, Ueber Psychoanalyse (the lectures delivered at Worcester,
    U.S.A.) (1909); Zur Geschichte der Psychoanalytischen Bewegung
    (1914); Selbstdarstellung (in Grote’s collection Die Medizin der Gegen-
    wart) (1925). Particularly accessible to English readers are: A. A. Brill,
    Psycho-Analysis (1922); Ernest Jones, Papers on Psycho-
    Analysis (1923). 

  • S.

    THE

    ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA

    A DICTIONARY OF ARTS,
    SCIENCES, LITERATURE
    & GENERAL INFORMATION

    The Three New Supplementary Volumes
    constituting with the Volumes of the
    Latest Standard Edition

    THE THIRTEENTH EDITION

    VOLUME III
    PACIFIC to ZUYDER ZEE
    and INDEX

    LONDON

    THE ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA COMPANY, LTD.

    NEW YORK

    THE ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA, INC.