• S.

    1910 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 35

    investigation itself as well as the infant sex theories
    created by it are of determinative significance in
    the building of the child’s character, and in the
    content of his later neuroses.

    It is unavoidable and quite normal that the child
    should make his parents the objects of his first object-
    choice. But his libido must not remain fixed on these
    first chosen objects, but must take them merely as a
    prototype and transfer from these to other persons
    in the time of definite object-choice. The breaking
    loose of the child from his parents is thus a problem
    impossible to escape if the social virtue of the young
    individual is not to be impaired. During the time
    that the repressive activity is making its choice
    among the partial sexual impulses and later, when
    the influence of the parents, which in the most
    essential way has furnished the material for these
    repressions, is lessened, great problems fall to the
    work of education, which at present certainly does not
    always solve them in the most intelligent and
    economic way. . . .

    Do not think that with these explanations of the
    sexual life and the sexual development of the child
    we have too far departed from psycho-analysis and
    the cure of neurotic disturbances. If you like, you
    may regard the psycho-analytic treatment only as
    a continued education for the overcoming of child-
    hood-remnants.

    Fifth Lecture. . . . With the discovery of infantile
    sexuality and the tracing back of the neurotic
    symptoms to erotic impulse-components we have
    arrived at several unexpected formula for expressing
    the nature and tendencies of neurotic disease. We
    see that the individual falls ill when in consequence
    of outer hindrances or inner lack of adaptability the

  • S.

    36 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 1910

    satisfaction of the erotic needs in the sphere of
    reality is denied. We see that he then flees to sick-
    ness, in order to find with its help a surrogate
    satisfaction for that denied him. We recognize that
    the symptoms of illness contain fractions of the
    sexual activity of the individual, or his whole sexual
    life, and we find in the turning away from reality
    the chief tendency and also the chief injury of the
    sickness. We may guess that the resistance of our
    patients against the cure is not a simple one, but is
    composed of many motives. Not only does the ego
    of the patient strive against the giving up of the
    repressions by which it has changed itself from its
    original constitution into its present form, but also
    the sexual impulses may not renounce their surrogate
    satisfaction so long as it is not certain that they can
    be offered anything better in the sphere of reality.

    The flight from the unsatisfying reality into what
    we call, on account of its biologically injurious
    nature, disease, but which is never without an
    individual gain in pleasure for the patient, takes
    place over the path of regression, the return to earlier
    phases of the sexual life, when satisfaction was not
    lacking. This regression is seemingly a twofold one,
    a temporal, in so far as the libido or erotic need falls
    back to a temporally earlier stage of development,
    and a formal, since the original and primitive psychic
    means of expression are applied to the expression of
    this need. Both sorts of regression focus in childhood
    and have their common point in the production of
    an infantile condition of sexual life.

    The deeper you penetrate into the pathogenesis of
    neurotic diseases, the more the connection of neuroses
    with other products of human mentality, even the
    most valuable, will be revealed to you. You will be

  • S.

    1910 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 37

    reminded that we men, with the high claims of our
    civilization and under the pressure of our repressions,
    find reality generally quite unsatisfactory and so
    keep up a life of fancy in which we love to compensate
    for what is lacking in the sphere of reality by the
    production of wish-fulfilments. In these phantasies
    is often contained very much of the particular
    constitutional essence of personality and of its
    tendencies, repressed in real life. The energetic and
    successful man is he who succeeds by dint of labour
    in transforming his wish-fancies into reality. Where
    this is not successful in consequence of the resistance
    of the outer world and the weakness of the individual,
    there begins the turning away from reality. The
    individual takes refuge in his satisfying world of
    fancy. Under certain favourable conditions it still
    remains possible for him to find another connecting
    link between these fancies and reality, instead of
    permanently becoming a stranger to it through the
    regression into the infantile. If the individual who is
    displeased with reality is in possession of that
    artistic talent which is still a psychological riddle, he
    can transform his fancies into artistic creations. So
    he escapes the fate of a neurosis and wins back his
    connection with reality by this round-about way.
    Where this opposition to the real world exists, but
    this valuable talent fails or proves insufficient, it is
    unavoidable that the libido, following the origin of
    the fancies, succeeds by means of regression in
    revivifying the infantile wishes and so producing a
    neurosis. The neurosis takes, in our time, the place
    of the cloister, in which were accustomed to take
    refuge all those whom life had undeceived or who
    felt themselves too weak for life. Let me give at this
    point the main result at which we have arrived by

  • S.

    38 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 1910

    the psycho-analytic investigation of neurotics,
    namely, that neuroses have no peculiar psychic
    content of their own, which is not also to be found in
    healthy states; or, as C. G. Jung has expressed it,
    neurotics fall ill of the same complexes with which
    we sound people struggle. It depends on quantita-
    tive relationships, on the relations of the forces
    wrestling with each other, whether the struggle
    leads to health, to a neurosis, or to compensatory
    over-functioning. . . .

    I have still withheld from you the most remarkable
    experience which corroborates our assumptions of
    the sexual impulse-forces of neurotics. Every time
    that we treat a neurotic psycho-analytically, there
    occurs in him the so-called phenomenon of trans-
    Jerence, that is, he applies to the person of the
    physician a great amount of tender emotion, often
    mixed with enmity, which has no foundation in any
    real relation, and must be derived in every respect
    from the old wish-fancies of the patient which have
    become unconscious. Every fragment of his emotive
    life, which can no longer be called back into memory,
    is accordingly lived over by the patient in his
    relations to the physician, and only by such a living
    of them over in the “ transference " is he convinced
    of the existence and the power of these unconscious
    sexual excitations. The symptoms, which to use a
    simile from chemistry, are the precipitates of earlier
    love experiences (in the widest sense), can only be
    dissolved in the higher temperature of the experience
    oftransference and transformed into other psychic pro-
    ducts. The physician plays in this reaction,to use an
    excellent expression of S. Ferenczi, the role of a catalytic
    ferment, which temporarily attracts to itself the affect
    which has become free in the course of the process.

  • S.

    1910 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 39

    The study of transference can also give you the
    key to the understanding of hypnotic suggestion,
    which we at first used with our patients as a technical
    means of investigation of the unconscious. Hypno-
    sis showed itself at that time to be a therapeutic help,
    but a hindrance to the scientific knowledge of the
    real nature of the case, since it cleared away the
    psychic resistances from a certain field, only to pile
    them up in an unscalable wall at the boundaries of
    this field. You must not think that the phenomenon
    of transference, about which I can unfortunately
    say only too little here, is created by the influence of
    the psycho-analytic treatment. The transference
    arises spontaneously in all human relations and in the
    relations of the patient to the physician; it is every-
    where the especial bearer of therapeutic influences,
    and it works the stronger the less one knows of its
    presence. Accordingly psycho-analysis does not
    create it, it merely discloses it to consciousness, and
    avails itself of it, in order to direct the psychic
    processes to the wished-for goal. But I cannot leave
    the theme of transference without stressing the fact
    that this phenomenon is of decisive importance to
    convince not only the patient, but also the physician.
    I know that all my adherents were first convinced of
    the correctness of my views through their experience
    with transference, and I can very well conceive that
    one may not win such a surety of judgment so long
    as he makes no psycho-analysis, and so has not
    himself observed the effects of transference. . . .

    I am of the opinion that there are, on the intellec-
    tual side, two hindrances to acknowledging the value
    of the psycho-analytic viewpoint: first, the fact that
    we are not accustomed to reckon with a strict
    determination of mental life, which holds without

    D

  • S.

    40 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 1910

    exception, and second, the lack of knowledge of the
    peculiarities through which unconscious mental
    processes differ from those conscious ones with which
    we are familiar. One of the most widespread
    resistances against the work of psycho-analysis with
    patients as with persons in health reduces to the
    latter of the two factors. One is afraid of doing
    harm by psycho-analysis, one is anxious about
    calling up into consciousness the repressed sexual
    impulses of the patient, as though there were danger
    that they could overpower the higher ethical
    strivings and rob him of his cultural acquisitions.
    One can see that the patient has sore places in his
    mental life, but one is afraid to touch them, lest his
    sufferings be increased. We may use this analogy.
    It is, of course, better not to touch diseased places
    when one can only cause pain. But we know that
    the surgeon does not refrain from the investigation
    and reinvestigation of the seat of illness, if his invasion
    has as its aim the restoration of lasting health.
    Nobody thinks of blaming him for the unavoidable
    difficulties of the investigation or the phenomena of
    reaction from the operation, if these only accomplish
    their purpose, and gain for the patient a final cure
    by temporarily making his condition worse. The
    case is similar in psycho-analysis; it can lay claim to
    the same things as surgery; the increase of pain
    which takes place in the patient during the treat-
    ment is very much less than that which the surgeon
    imposes upon him, and especially negligible in
    comparison with the pains of serious illness. But the
    consequence which is feared, that of a disturbance of
    the cultural character by the impulse which has been
    freed from repression, is wholly impossible. In
    relation to this anxiety we must consider what our

  • S.

    1910 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 41

    experiences have taught us with certainty, that the
    somatic and mental power of a wish, if once its
    represion has not succeeded, is incomparably
    stronger when it is unconscious than when it is
    conscious, so that by being made conscious it can
    only be weakened. The unconscious wish cannot be
    influenced, is free from all strivings in the contrary
    direction, while the conscious is inhibited by those
    wishes which are also conscious and which strive
    against it. The work of psycho-analysis accordingly
    presents a better substitute, in the service of the
    highest and most valuable cultural strivings, for the
    repression which has failed.

    Now what is the fate of the wishes which have
    become free by psycho-analysis, by what means
    shall they be made harmless for the life of the
    individual ? There are several ways. The general
    consequence is, that the wish is consumed during the
    work by the correct mental activity of those better
    tendencies which are opposed to it. The repression
    is supplanted by a condemnation carried through
    with the best means at one’s disposal. This is possible,
    since for the most part we have to abolish only the
    effects of earlier developmental stages of the ego.
    The individual for his part only repressed the useless
    impulse, because at that time he was himself still
    incompletely organized and weak; in his present
    maturity and strength he can, perhaps, conquer
    without injury to himself that which is inimical to
    him. A second issue of the work of psycho-analysis
    may be that the revealed unconscious impulses can
    now arrive at those useful applications which, in the
    case of undisturbed development, they would have
    found earlier. The extirpation of the infantile wishes
    is not at all the ideal aim of development. The

  • S.

    42 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 1910

    neurotic has lost, by his repressions, many sources of
    mental energy whose contributions would have been
    very valuable for his character building and his
    life activities. We know a far more purposive
    process of development, the so-called sublimation, by
    which the energy of infantile wish-excitations is not
    secluded, but remains capable of application, while
    for the particular excitations, instead of becoming
    useless, a higher, eventually no longer sexual, goal is
    set up. The components of the sexual instinct are
    especially distinguished by such a capacity for the
    sublimation and exchange of their sexual goal for one
    more remote and socially more valuable. We probably
    owe the highest achievements of our culture to energy
    which has been liberated in this way. A repression
    taking place at an early period precludes the subli-
    mation of the repressed impulse; after the removal
    of the repression the way to sublimation is again free.

    We must not neglect, also, to glance at the third of
    the possible issues. A certain part of the suppressed
    libidinous excitation has a right to direct satisfaction
    and ought to find it in life. The claims of our
    civilization make life too hard for the greater part of
    humanity, and so further the aversion to reality and
    the origin of neuroses, without producing an excess
    of cultural gain by this excess of sexual repression.
    We ought not to go so far as fully to neglect the
    original animal part of our nature, we ought not to
    forget that the happiness of individuals cannot be
    dispensed with as one of the aims of our culture.
    The plasticity of the sexual-components, manifest in
    their capacity for sublimation, may induce the
    temptation to accomplish ever greater achievements
    of culture by a more and more far-reaching sublima-
    tion. But just as with our machines we expect to

  • S.

    1910 THE ORIGIN OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 43

    change only a certain fraction of the applied heat
    into useful mechanical work, so we ought not to try
    to separate the sexual impulse in its whole extent of
    energy from its peculiar goal. It cannot be done,
    and if the narrowing of sexuality is pushed too far it
    will have all the evil effects of a robbery.

    I do not know whether you will regard the exhorta-
    tion with which I close as a presumptuous one. I
    only venture the indirect presentation of my con-
    viction, if I relate an old tale, whose application
    you may make yourselves. German literature
    knows a town called Schilda, to whose inhabitants
    were attributed all sorts of clever pranks. The wise-
    acres, so the story goes, had a horse, with whose
    powers of work they were well satisfied, and against
    whom they had only one grudge, that he consumed
    so much expensive oats. They concluded that by
    good management they would break him of this
    bad habit, by cutting down his rations by several
    stalks each day, until he had learned to do without
    them altogether. Things went finely for a while,
    the horse was weaned to one stalk a day, and on the
    next day he would at last work without fodder.
    On the morning of this day the malicious horse was
    found dead; the citizens of Schilda could not
    understand why he had died. We should be
    inclined to believe that the horse had starved, and
    that without a certain ration of oats no work could
    be expected from an animal.