Totem and Taboo1913-001/1919.en
  • S.

    v

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    THE essays treated here appeared under the
    subtitle of this book in the first numbers of the
    periodical Imago edited by me. They repre-
    sent my first efforts to apply view-points and
    results of psychoanalysis to unexplained prob-
    lems of racial psychology. In method this
    book contrasts with that of W. Wundt and the
    works of the Zurich Psychoanalytic School.
    The former tries to accomplish the same object
    through assumptions and procedures from non-
    analytic psychology, while the latter follow
    the opposite course and strive to settle prob-
    lems of individual pyschology by referring
    to material of racial psychology1. I am
    pleased to say that the first stimulus for my own
    works came from these two sources.

    I am fully aware of the shortcomings in these
    essays. I shall not touch upon those which are
    characteristic of first efforts at investigation.
    The others, however, demand a word of

    1 Jung: Wandlungen and Symbole der Libido (Transformations
    and Symbols of the Libido) translated by Dr. Beatrice Hinkle
    under the title The Psychology of the Unconscious, and Principles
    of Psychoanalysis, Nervous and Mental Diseases.

  • S.

    vi

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    explanation. The four essays which are here
    collected will be of interest to a wide circle of
    educated people, but they can only be
    thoroughly understood and judged by those
    who are really acquainted with psychoanalysis
    as such. It is hoped that they may serve as a
    bond between students of ethnology, philology,
    folklore and of the allied sciences, and psycho-
    analysts; they cannot, however, supply both
    groups the entire requisites for such co-opera-
    tion. They will not furnish the former with
    sufficient insight into the new pyschological
    technique, nor will the pyschoanalysts acquire
    through them an adequate command over the
    material to be elaborated. Both groups will
    have to content themselves with whatever
    attention they can stimulate here and there
    and with the hope that frequent meetings be-
    tween them will not remain unproductive for
    science.

    The two principal themes, totem and taboo,
    which give the name to this small book are not
    treated alike here. The problem of taboo is
    presented more exhaustively, and the effort to
    solve it is approached with perfect confidence.
    The investigation of totemism may be modestly
    expressed as: “This is all that psychoanalytic
    study can contribute at present to the elucida-
    tion of the problem of totemism.” This differ-
     

  • S.

    vii

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    ence in the treatment of the two subjects is
    due to the fact that taboo still exists in our
    midst. To be sure, it is negatively conceived
    and directed to different contents, but according
    to its psychological nature, it is still nothing
    else than Kant’s ‘Categorical Imperative’,
    which tends to act compulsively and rejects
    all conscious motivations. On the other hand,
    totemism is a religio-social institution which
    is alien to our present feelings; it has long
    been abandoned and replaced by new forms
    In the religions, morals, and customs of the
    civilized races of to-day it has left only slight
    traces, and even among those races where it is
    still retained, it has had to undergo great
    changes. The social and material progress of
    the history of mankind could obviously change
    taboo much less than totemism.

    In this book the attempt is ventured to find
    the original meaning of totemism through its
    infantile traces, that is, through the indications
    in which it reappears in the development of our
    own children. The close connection between
    totem and taboo indicates the further paths to
    the hypothesis maintained here. And although
    this hypothesis leads to somewhat improbable
    conclusions, there is no reason for rejecting the
    possibility that it comes more or less near to
    the reality which is so hard to reconstruct.