Totem and Taboo1913-001/1938.en
  • S.

    5

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    The essays treated here appeared under the subtitle of
    this book in the first numbers of the periodical Imago
    edited by me. They represent my first efforts to apply
    view-points and results of psychoanalysis to un-
    explained problems of racial psychology. In method
    this book contrasts with that of W. Wundt and the
    works of the Zurich Psychoanalytic School. The
    former tries to accomplish the same object through
    assumptions and procedures from non-analytic psycho-
    logy, while the latter follow the opposite course and
    strive to settle problems of individual psychology by
    referring to material of racial psychology.1) I am
    pleased to say that the first stimulus for my own works
    came from these two sources.

    I am fully aware of the shortcomings in these essays.
    I shall not touch upon those which are characteristic
    of first efforts at investigation. The others, however,
    demand a word of explanation. The four essays which
    are here collected will be of interest to a wide circle of
    educated people, but they can only be thoroughly
    understood and judged by those who are really ac-
    customed to this method of thought.

    1)Jung: Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Transformations
    and Symbols of the Libido), translated by Dr. Beatrice Hinkle
    under the title The Psychology of the Unconscious, and Principles
    of Psychoanalysis, Nervous and Mental Diseases.

  • S.

    6

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    quainted with psychoanalysis as such. It is hoped that
    they may serve as a bond between students of ethno-
    logy, folklore and of the allied sciences, and
    psychoanalysts; they cannot, however, supply both
    groups the entire requisites for such co-
    operation.
    They will not furnish the former with sufficient insight
    into the new psychological technique, nor will the
    psychoanalysts acquire through them an adequate
    command over the material to be elaborated. Both
    groups will have to content themselves with whatever
    attention they can stimulate here and there and with
    the hope that frequent meetings between them will not
    remain unproductive for science.

    The two principal themes, totem and taboo, which
    give the name to this small book are not treated alike
    here. The problem of taboo is presented more ex-
    haustively, and the effort to solve it is approached with
    perfect confidence. The investigation of totemism
    may be modestly expressed as: “This is all that
    psycho-
    analytic study can contribute at present to the
    elucidation of the problem of totemism.” This
    difference in the treatment of the two subjects is due to
    the fact that taboo still exists in our midst. To be
    sure, it is negatively conceived and directed to different
    contents, but according to its psychological nature, it is
    still nothing else than Kant’s “Categorical Impera-
    tive,” which tends to act compulsively and rejects all
    conscious motivations. On the other hand totemism
    is a religio-
    social institution which is alien to our
    present feelings; it has long been abandoned and

  • S.

    7

    AUTHOR'S PREFACE

    replaced by new forms. In the religions, morals, and
    customs of the civilized races of to-
    day it has left only
    slight traces, and even among those races where it is
    still retained, it has had to undergo great changes.
    The social and material progress of the history of man-
    kind could obviously change taboo much less than
    totemism.

    In this book the attempt is ventured to find the
    original meaning of totemism through its infantile
    traces, that is, through the indications in which it re-
    appears in the development of our own children. The
    close connection between totem and taboo indicates
    the further paths to the hypothesis maintained here.
    And although this hypothesis leads to somewhat
    improbable conclusions, there is no reason for rejecting
    the possibility that it comes more or less near to the
    reality which is so hard to reconstruct.