Totem and Taboo1913-001/1918.en
  • S.

    iii

    AUTHOR’S PREFACE

    THE essays treated here appeared under the
    subtitle of this book in the first numbers of the
    periodical “Imago” edited by me. They repre-
    sent my first efforts to apply view-points and re-
    sults of psychoanalysis to unexplained problems
    of racial psychology. In method this book con-
    trasts with that of W. Wundt and the works of
    the Zurich Psychoanalytic School. The former
    tries to accomplish the same object through as-
    sumptions and procedures from non-analytic
    psychology, while the latter follow the opposite
    course and strive to settle problems of individual
    psychology by referring to material of racial
    psychology.1 I am pleased to say that the first
    stimulus for my own works came from these two
    sources.

    I am fully aware of the shortcomings in these
    essays. I shall not touch upon those which are
    characteristic of first efforts at investigation.
    The others, however, demand a word of explana-
    tion.

    1Jung: Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Transformations
    and Symbols of the Libido) translated by Dr. Beatrice Hinkle
    under the title “The Psychology of the Unconscious,” Moffat,
    Yard & Co., and “Principles of Psychoanalysis, Nervous and Men-
    tal Diseases,” Monograph Series.

  • S.

    iv

    PREFACE

    tion. The four essays which are here collected
    will be of interest to a wide circle of educated peo-
    ple, but they can only be thoroughly understood
    and judged by those who are really acquainted
    with psychoanalysis as such. It is hoped that
    they may serve as a bond between students of
    ethnology, philology, folklore and of the allied
    sciences, and psychoanalysts; they cannot, how-
    ever, supply both groups the entire requisites for
    such coöperation. They will not furnish the
    former with sufficient insight into the new
    psychological technique, nor will the psycho-
    analysts acquire through them an adequate com-
    mand over the material to be elaborated. Both
    groups will have to content themselves with what-
    ever attention they can stimulate here and there
    and with the hope that frequent meetings be-
    tween them will not remain unproductive for sci-
    ence.

    The two principle themes, totem and taboo,
    which gave the name to this small book are not
    treated alike here. The problem of taboo is pre-
    sented more exhaustively, and the effort to solve
    it is approached with perfect confidence. The
    investigation of totemism may be modestly ex-
    pressed as: “This is all that psychoanalytic study
    can contribute at present to the elucida-
    tion of
    the problem of totemism.” This difference in
    the treatment of the two subjects is due to the fact

  • S.

    v

    PREFACE

    that taboo still exists in our midst. To be sure,
    it is negatively conceived and directed to different
    contents, but according to its psychological na-
    ture, it is still nothing else than Kant’s “Cate-
    gorical Imperative,” which tends to act compul-
    sively and rejects all conscious motivations. On
    the other hand, totemism is a religio-social insti-
    tution which is alien to our present feelings; it has
    long been abandoned and replaced by new forms.
    In the religions, morals, and customs of the
    civilized races of today it has left only slight
    traces, and even among those races where it is
    still retained, it has had to undergo great
    changes. The social and material progress of
    the history of mankind could obviously change
    taboo much less than totemism.

    In this book the attempt is ventured to find the
    original meaning of totemism through its infan-
    tile traces, that is, through the indications in
    which it reappears in the development of our
    own children. The close connection between
    totem and taboo indicates the further paths to the
    hypothesis maintained here. And although this
    hypothesis leads to somewhat improbable con-
    clusions, there is no reason for rejecting the pos-
    sibility that it comes more or less near to the
    reality which is so hard to reconstruct.