• S.

    FORGETTING OF FOREIGN WORDS

  • S.

    17

    II

    FORGETTING OF FOREIGN WORDS

    THE ordinary vocabulary of our own language
    seems to be protected against forgetting within
    the limits of normal function, but it is quite dif-
    ferent with words from a foreign language. The
    tendency to forget such words extends to all parts
    of speech. In fact, depending on our own
    general state and the degree of fatigue, the first
    manifestation of functional disturbance evinces
    itself in the irregularity of our control over
    foreign vocabulary. In a series of cases this
    forgetting follows the same mechanism as the one
    revealed in the example Signorelli. As a demon-
    stration of this I shall report a single analysis,
    characterized, however, by valuable features, con-
    cerning the forgetting of a word, not a noun,
    from a Latin quotation. Before proceeding,
    allow me to give a full and clear account of this
    little episode.

    Last summer, while journeying on my vacation,
    I renewed the acquaintance of a young man of
    academic education, who, as I soon noticed, was
    conversant with some of my works. In our con-

  • S.

    18

    Psychopathology of Everyday Life

    versation we drifted—I no longer remember how
    —to the social position of the race to which we
    both belonged. He, being ambitious, bemoaned
    the fact that his generation, as he expressed it,
    was destined to grow crippled, that it was pre-
    vented from developing its talents and from grati-
    fying its desires. He concluded his passionately
    felt speech with the familiar verse from Virgil :
    Exoriare . . . in which the unhappy Dido
    leaves her vengeance upon Aeneas to posterity.
    Instead of “concluded,” I should have said
    “wished to conclude,” for he could not bring the
    quotation to an end, and attempted to conceal the
    open gap in his memory by transposing the
    words :—

    “Exoriar(e) ex nostris ossibus ultor !”

    He finally became piqued and said : “Please
    don’t make such a mocking face, as if you were
    gloating over my embarrassment, but help me.
    There is something missing in this verse. How
    does it read in its complete form? ”
    “With pleasure,” I answered, and cited it
    correctly :—

    “Exoriar(e) aliquis nostris ex ossibus ultor !”

    “It is too stupid to forget such a word,” he
    said. “By the way, I understand you claim
    that forgetting is not without its reasons; I
    should be very curious to find out how I came to
    forget this indefinite pronoun ‘aliquis.’ ”

  • S.

    19

    Forgetting of Foreign Words

    I gladly accepted the challenge, as I hoped to
    get an addition to my collection, and said, “We
    can easily do this, but I must ask you to tell me
    frankly and without any criticism everything that
    occurs to your mind after you focus your atten-
    tion, without any particular intention, on the for-
    gotten word.”1)

    “Very well, the ridiculous idea comes to me to
    divide the word in the following way: a and
    liquis.”

    “What does that mean?”

    “I don’t know.”

    “What else does that recall to you?”

    “The thought goes on to reliques–liquidation
    –liquidity–fluid.”

    “Does that mean anything to you now?”

    “No, not by a long shot.”

    “Just go ahead.”

    “I now think,” he said, laughing sarcastically,
    “of Simon of Trent, whose relics I saw two years
    ago in a church in Trent. I think of the old
    accusation which has been brought against the
    Jews again, and of the work of Kleinpaul, who
    sees in these supposed sacrifices reincarnations or
    revivals, so to speak, of the Saviour.”

    “This stream of thoughts has some connection

    1)This is the usual way of bringing to consciousness hidden
    ideas. Cf. The Interpretation of Dreams, pp. 83–4, translated
    by A. A. Brill, The Macmillan Company, New York, and
    Allen, London.

  • S.

    20

    Psychopathology of Everyday Life

    with the theme which we discussed before the
    Latin word escaped you.”

    “You are right. I now think of an article in an
    Italian journal which I have recently read. I
    believe it was entitled: ‘What St. Augustine said
    Concerning Women.’ What can you do with
    this?’ ”

    I waited.

    “Now I think of something which surely has
    no connection with the theme.”

    “Oh, please abstain from all criticism,
    and—
    ”

    “Oh, I know! I recall a handsome old gentle-
    man whom I met on my journey last week. He
    was really an original type. He looked like a
    big bird of prey. His name, if you care to know,
    is Benedict.”

    “Well, at least you give a grouping of saints
    and Church fathers : St. Simon, St. Augustine,
    and St. Benedict. I believe that there was a
    Church father named Origen. Three of these,
    moreover, are Christian names, like Paul in the
    name Kleinpaul.”

    “Now I think of St. Januarius and his blood
    miracle—I find that the thoughts are running
    mechanically.”

    “Just stop a moment; both St. Januarius and
    St. Augustine have something to do with the
    calendar. Will you recall to me the blood
    miracle?”

  • S.

    21

    Forgetting of Foreign Words

    “Don’t you know about it? The blood of St.
    Januarius is preserved in a phial in a church in
    Naples, and on a certain holiday a miracle takes
    place causing it to liquefy. The people think a
    great deal of this miracle, and become very
    excited if the liquefying process is retarded, as
    happened once during the French occupation.
    The General in command—or Garibaldi, if I am
    not mistaken—then took the priest aside, and with
    a very significant gesture pointed out to him the
    soldiers arrayed without, and expressed his hope
    that the miracle would soon take place. And it
    actually took place. . . .”

    “Well, what else comes to your mind? Why
    do you hesitate?”

    “Something really occurred to me . . . but
    it is too intimate a matter to impart . . . .
    besides, I see no connection and no necessity for
    telling it.”

    “I will take care of the connection. Of course
    I cannot compel you to reveal what is disagree-
    able to you, but then you should not have
    demanded that I tell you why you forgot the word
    ‘aliquis.’ ”

    “Really? Do you think so? Well, I suddenly
    thought of a woman from whom I could easily
    get a message that would be very annoying to us
    both.”

    “That she missed her courses?”

    “How could you guess such a thing?”

  • S.

    22

    Psychopathology of Everyday Life

    “That was not very difficult. You prepared
    me for it long enough. Just think of the saints
    of the calendar, the liquefying of the blood on
    a certain day, the excitement if the event does
    not take place, and the distinct threat that the
    miracle must take place. . . . Indeed, you have
    elaborated the miracle of St. Januarius into a
    clever allusion to the courses of the woman.”

    “It was surely without my knowledge. And
    do you really believe that my inability to repro-
    duce the word ‘aliquis’ was due to this anxious
    expectation?”

    “That appears to me absolutely certain.
    Don’t you recall dividing it into a-liquis and the
    associations: reliques, liquidation, fluid? Shall
    I also add to this connection the fact that St.
    Simon, to whom you got by way of the reliques,
    was sacrificed as a child?”

    “Please stop. I hope you do not take these
    thoughts–if I really entertained them–seriously.
    I will, however, confess to you that the lady is
    Italian, and that I visited Naples in her company.
    But may not all this be coincidental?”

    “I must leave to your own judgment whether
    you can explain all these connections through the
    assumption of coincidence. I will tell you, how-
    ever, that every similar case that you analyse
    will lead you to just such remarkable ‘coincidences!’”

    I have more than one reason for valuing this

  • S.

    23

    Forgetting of Foreign Words

    little analysis, for which I am indebted to my
    travelling companion. First, because in this case
    I was able to make use of a source which is other-
    wise inaccessible to me. Most of the examples of
    psychic disturbances of daily life that I have here
    compiled I was obliged to take from observation
    of myself. I endeavoured to evade the far richer
    material furnished me by my neurotic patients,
    because I had to preclude the objection that the
    phenomena in question were only the result and
    manifestation of the neurosis. It was therefore
    of special value for my purpose to have a stranger
    free from a neurosis offer himself as a subject for
    such examination. This analysis is also impor-
    tant in other respects, inasmuch as it elucidates a
    case of word-
    forgetting without substitutive recol-
    lection, and thus confirms the principle formu-
    lated above, namely, that the appearance or
    nonappearance of incorrect substitutive recollec-
    tions does not constitute an essential distinction.1

    1Finer observation reduces somewhat the contrast between
    the analyses of Signorelli and aliquis as far as the substitutive
    recollections are concerned. Here, too, the forgetting seems
    to be accompanied by substitutive formations. When I
    later asked my companion whether in his effort to recall
    the forgotten word he did not think of some substitution,
    he informed me that he was at first tempted to put an ab
    into the verse: nostris ab ossibus (perhaps the disjointed part
    of a-liquis) and that later the word exoriare obtruded itself
    with particular distinctness and persistency. Being sceptical,
    he added that it was apparently due to the fact that it was
    the first word of the verse. But when I asked him to focus

  • S.

    24

    Psychopathology of Everyday Life

    But the principal value of the example aliquis
    lies in another of its distinctions from the case
    Signorelli. In the latter example the reproduc-
    tion of the name becomes disturbed through the
    after-effects of a stream of thought which began
    shortly before and was interrupted, but whose
    content had no distinct relation to the new theme
    which contained the name Signorelli. Between
    the repression and the theme of the forgotten
    name there existed only the relation of temporal
    contiguity, which reached the other in order that
    the two should be able to form a connec-
    tion

    his attention on the associations to exoriare he gave me the
    word exorcism. This makes me think that the reinforcement
    of exoriare in the reproduction has really the value of such
    substitution. It probably came through the association
    exorcism from the names of the saints. However, those are
    refinements upon which no value need be laid. It seems
    now quite possible that the appearance of any kind of
    substitutive recollection is a constant sign—perhaps only
    characteristic and misleading—of the purposive forgetting
    motivated by repression. This substitution might also exist
    in the reinforcement of an element akin to the thing for
    gotten, even where incorrect substitutive names fail to appear.
    Thus, in the example Signorelli, as long as the name of the
    painter remained inaccessible to me, I had more than a clear
    visual memory of the cycle of his frescoes, and of the
    picture of himself in the corner; at least it was more inten-
    sive than any of my other visual memory traces. In another
    case, also reported in my essay of 1898, I had hopelessly
    forgotten the street name and address connected with a
    disagreeable visit in a strange city, but—as if to mock me—
    the house number appeared especially vivid, whereas the
    memory of numbers usually causes me the greatest difficulty.

  • S.

    25

    Forgetting of Foreign Words

    through an outer association.1 On the other hand,
    in the example aliquis one can note no trace of
    such an independent repressed theme which could
    occupy conscious thought immediately before and
    then re-echo as a disturbance. The disturbance
    of the reproduction proceeded here from the inner
    part of the theme touched upon, and was brought
    about by the fact that unconsciously a contra-
    diction arose against the wish-idea represented
    in the quotation.

    The origin must be construed in the following
    manner: The speaker deplored the fact that the
    present generation of his people was being
    deprived of its rights, and like Dido he presaged
    that a new generation would take upon itself
    vengeance against the oppressors. He therefore
    expressed the wish for posterity. In this moment
    he was interrupted by the contradictory thought:
    “Do you really wish so much for posterity?
    That is not true. Just think in what a predica-
    ment you would be if you should now receive the
    information that you must expect posterity from
    the quarter you have in mind! No, you want no
    posterity—as much as you need it for your veng-
    eance.

    1 I am not fully convinced of the lack of an inner con
    nection between the two streams of thought in the case
    of Signorelli. In carefully following the repressed thought
    concerning the theme of death and sexual life, one does
    strike an idea which shows a near relation to the theme of
    the frescoes of Orvieto.

  • S.

    26

    Psychopathology of Everyday Life

    ance.” This contradiction asserts itself, just as
    in the example Signorelli, by forming an outer
    association between one of his ideation elements
    and an element of the repressed wish, but here it
    is brought about in a most strained manner
    through what seems an artificial detour of asso-
    ciations. Another important agreement with the
    example Signorelli results from the fact that the
    contradiction originates from repressed sources
    and emanates from thoughts which would cause
    a deviation of attention.

    So much for the diversity and the inner rela-
    tionship of both paradigms of the forgetting of
    names. We have learned to know a second
    mechanism of forgetting, namely, the disturbance
    of thought through an inner contradiction ema-
    nating from the repression. In the course of this
    discussion we shall repeatedly meet with this pro-
    cess, which seems to me to be the more easily
    understood.