• S.

    Dr. A. A. Brill
    100 West 78th Street 
    New York
    Telephone 8101 Riverside 
    Office hours
    9 to 12, 5 to 

    Sept 20, 08

    My dear Professor.

    I thank you very much for your advise 
    about the Unbewussten.  I am not sure whether I will 
    write this article for Morton Prince’s journal, though 
    he is very anxious that I should do so.  I jut had 
    a letter from him in which he tells me that he has 
    written to you about the same subject. He seems to entertain 
    some resistences about our work which I think are 
    mainly due to the fact that he knows but little about it. 
    The reason I am hesitating about writing the article mentioned 
    is this: Jones, in our conversation, always implied 
    that he had some arrangement with Prince to take charge 
    of the same work. When Prince asked me to do it I was 
    very much surprised and I immediately wrote to Jones 
    and Prince. Jones has not written to me for some time 
    in fact I don’t know whether he is here or in Europe 
    and Prince states that he had absolutely no such 
    agreement with Jones.  He says that Jones corresponded 
    with Donnely – assistant editor – and as far as he 
    understands Jones was to take charge of the German 
    literature in general. I am however still waiting to hear 
    from Jones as I do not care to interfere with his

  • S.

    plans.  I wonder what happened to him, have you 
    heard anything about his whereabouts?  I am very 
    pleased to hear that you have gone over to Zürich for 
    a few days. It will certainly help to draw the bonds 
    tighter. I knew for some time that Jung was not 
    quite contented. In fact I could see this at the congress 
    but I must say that his contentions were perfectly 
    baseless. I was more astonished when Jones showed 
    me later a letter sent to him by Jung. Your visit to 
    Zürich ought certainly to rectify matters. Jung is a 
    person of moods he was much affected by Abraham’s 
    paper he remarked to me that he considered it „plagiar-
    ism“.  I really could not see why he has had that 
    view. Of course I write this for your own information.

    I know Dr. Parker but I don’t know what connection he 
    has with Columbia, he is not in any way connected with 
    the clinic else I would know it.  I am pleased that 
    you refused his offer simply because I prefer to have 
    your views spread from your own works.  As for me 
    I am assiduously working and things look well. The more 
    I analyze the more I learn and become convinced 
    of the truth of your teachings.  I have convinced some 
    men in the profession that psychoanalysis can do some 
    thing. One of the assistants in our clinic gave me a case 
    which he considered „some mental trouble“ and quite 
    hopeless. The young man suffered for years, being unable 
    to do any work. After a few weeks work I removed all 
    his symptoms and he is now happy and working. 
    It is a nice case of hysteria. Now wishing you and your 
    family a very happy New Year I remain 
    Sincerely Yours
    A Brill