23 March 1914  69 Portland Court  London W

Dear Professor Freud,

«IP4,0»I got today your letter, dated the 19th, and see that my last letter must have gone astray or been delayed.  I wrote a full one of six pages on the 13th, and posted it on the midday of the 14th.  Perhaps it may yet turn up.

I congratulate you sincerely on the birth of your first grandchild,«FN1.××Ernst Wolfgang Halberstadt, son of Sophie Freud and Max Halberstadt.» and am sure you feel proud of the event.

I was interested to read your remarks about Loe (I dare say it is easier for you to understand why I loved her so much than why I also hated her), but am eager to know if the urological examination has taken place, and the results of it.

My own illness, of which I gave an account in the lost letter«FN1.××See Jones's previous letter, which was not lost.» (it is not interesting enough to repeat it) is now entirely over, and I am starting work again with a good heart.

I will review Prince's book on the «MDUL»Unconscious«MDNM» (which of course has nothing in common with the real unconscious)«FN1.××See note 10 to letter 7.» and will ask Eder to review Tuckey's.«FN1.××For Eder's review, see «MDUL»Zeitschrift«MDNM», 2(1914):178‑179.

»  Constance Long's contribution was written before she met Jung, and owes any value it may have to Eder and Bryan, who supplied the examples, etc.  How do you interpret your Verschreiben in regard to this (perhaps it is written before [you]«FN1.××Crossed out in the original.» she heard of Jung's gospel)?

Before this you will have received my answer to Abraham, unless it also has gone astray (it had the same date as the other letter).  I should prefer to wait till the «MDUL»Jahrbuch«MDNM» appears.  Is there any chance of this been [being] hastened?

Please let me know if my letter does not turn up, because in that case I have to repeat some of the contents (doings in London, etc.).

With kindest regards  Yours  Jones.